Hybrid Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease and Dystonia Improves Side Effects, Maintaining Clinical Benefit

Authors

  • Diogo Costa Serviço de Neurologia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7625-0813
  • Margarida Calejo Serviço de Neurologia / Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-1263
  • Nuno Vila-Chã Serviço de Neurologia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Joana Damásio Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto; CGPP e UnIGENE, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto; Unit in Multidisciplinary Research on Biomedicine, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-6398
  • Carla Silva Serviço de Neurocirurgia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Eduardo Procaci da Cunha Serviço de Neurocirurgia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Luís Botelho Serviço de Neurorradiologia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • António Verdelho Serviço de Neurocirurgia / Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Alexandre Mendes Serviço de Neurologia / Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/AO/220075/2023

Keywords:

Deep Brain Stimulation, Dystonia/therapy, Parkinson Disease/therapy

Abstract

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in movement disorders does not always achieve optimal symptomatic control. Most common issues involve suboptimal electrode positioning and target stimulation and troublesome side effects limiting the therapeutic window. Recently approved implantable pulse generators (IPG) allow for pulse widths lower than 60 μs, increasing the therapeutic window, and current steering. These new constant-current IPG (CC-IPG), in addition to these characteristics, have rechargeable, thus longer duration, batteries. This work aims to describe a tertiary center’s experience with replacing a constant-voltage stimulation non-rechargeable implantable pulse generator (CV-IPG), at the end of its battery’s lifespan, with a CC-IPG, with more options in pulse duration changes and multiplesource current steering. Methods: A retrospective review of the clinical records of patients submitted to DBS who had their CV-IPG replaced with CC-IPG was performed, documenting reason for preference, stimulation parameters, clinical benefit pre and post-replacement and side effects.
Results: Six patients who fulfilled the criteria were identified, four with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and two with dystonia. The reasons for preference were: stimulation side effects (2), suboptimal benefit (1), long battery duration (3). Side effects were improved by using a 30 μs pulse in two patients. Current steering allowed the shortening of OFF periods in 1 PD patient. One patient with dystonia had initial decrease in clinical benefit but recovered after amplitude correction according to impedance. The other two patients remained stable post-replacement. Conclusion: Replacement of CV-IPG with CC-IPG proved feasible and safe, with non-inferior clinical benefit, additionally providing pulse lowering and current steering strategies for solving suboptimal results with DBS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Limousin P, Pollak P, Benazzouz A, Hoffmann D, Broussolle E, Perret JE, et al. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for severe Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 1995;10:672–4. doi:10.1002/mds.870100523.

Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus or the Pars Interna of the Globus Pallidus in Parkinson’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:956–63. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa000827.

Buhmann C, Huckhagel T, Engel K, Gulberti A, Hidding U, Poetter-Nerger M, et al. Adverse events in deep brain stimulation: A retrospective long-term analysis of neurological, psychiatric and other occurrences. PLoS One. 2017;12:1– 21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178984.

Okun MS, Gallo B V., Mandybur G, Jagid J, Foote KD, Revilla FJ, et al. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation with a constant-current device in Parkinson’s disease: An open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:140–9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70308-8.

Timmermann L, Jain R, Chen L, Maarouf M, Barbe MT, Allert N, et al. Multiple-source current steering in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease (the VANTAGE study): A non-randomised, prospective, multicentre, open-label study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:693-701. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00087-3.

Amami P, Mascia MM, Franzini A, Saba F, Albanese A. Shifting from constant-voltage to constant-current in Parkinson’s disease patients with chronic stimulation. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1505–8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2961-2.

Reich MM, Steigerwald F, Sawalhe AD, Reese R, Gunalan K, Johannes S, et al. Short pulse width widens the therapeutic window of subthalamic neurostimulation. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2:427-32. doi: 10.1002/acn3.168.

Bouthour W, Wegrzyk J, Momjian S, Péron J, Fleury V, Tomkova Chaoui E, et al. Short pulse width in subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, doubleblind study. Mov Disord. 2018;33:169-73. doi: 10.1002/ mds.27265.

Steigerwald F, Timmermann L, Kühn A, Schnitzler A, Reich MM, Kirsch AD, et al. Pulse duration settings in subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33:165-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.27238.

Dayal V, Grover T, Limousin P, Akram H, Cappon D, Candelario J, et al. The effect of short pulse width settings on the therapeutic window in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8:273-9. doi: 10.3233/JPD-171272.

Chaturvedi A, Foutz TJ, McIntyre CC. Current steering to activate targeted neural pathways during deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic region. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:36977. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.05.002.

Bronstein JM, Tagliati M, McIntyre C, Chen R, Cheung T, Hargreaves EL, et al. The rationale driving the evolution of deep brain stimulation to constant-current devices. Neuromodulation. 2015;18:85-8; discussion 88-9. doi: 10.1111/ ner.12227.

Tagliati M. Multiple-source current steering: A new arrow in the DBS quiver. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:670–1. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00099-X.

Butson CR, McIntyre CC. Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.004.

Ramirez De Noriega F, Eitan R, Marmor O, Lavi A, Linetzky E, Bergman H, et al. Constant current versus constant voltage subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93:114-21. doi: 10.1159/000368443.

Preda F, Cavandoli C, Lettieri C, Pilleri M, Antonini A, Eleopra R, et al. Switching from constant voltage to constant current in deep brain stimulation: A multicenter experience of mixed implants for movement disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:190–5. doi: 10.1111/ene.12835.

Wolf ME, Klockziem M, Majewski O, Schulte DM, Krauss JK, Blahak C. Implementation of new technology in patients with chronic deep brain stimulation: Switching from non-rechargeable constant voltage to rechargeable constant current stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;97:362– 8. doi: 10.1159/000505076.

Soh D, Lozano AM, Fasano A. Hybrid deep brain stimulation system to manage stimulation-induced side effects in essential tremor patients. Park Relat Disord. 2019;58:85–6. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.07.013.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Costa D, Calejo M, Vila-Chã N, Damásio J, Silva C, Procaci da Cunha E, et al. Hybrid Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease and Dystonia Improves Side Effects, Maintaining Clinical Benefit. Sinapse [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 18 [cited 2024 Jul. 15];23(2):75-81. Available from: https://sinapse.pt/index.php/journal/article/view/20

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)