Peer Review na Sinapse: Garantindo a Qualidade na Publicação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/ED/133/2024Palavras-chave:
Publicação, Revisão por ParesDownloads
Referências
Smith JA Jr. The importance of peer review. J Urol. 2017;197:1374–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.115.
Masic I. Peer review - essential for article and journal scientific assessment and validity. Med Arch. 2016;70:168–71. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.168-171.
Donato H, Cardim N. Open letter to our reviewers: Justice is needed! Rev Port Cardiol. 2021; 40. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2020.12.008
Liang W, Zhang Y, Cao H, et al. Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis. arXiv, 2310.01783; October 3, 2023. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01783 8.
Biswas S, Dobaria D, Cohen HL. ChatGPT and the future of journal reviews: a feasibility study. Yale J Biol Med. 2023;96: 415-420
Bauchner H, Rivara FP. Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review. Health Affairs Scholar.2024;2:qxae058. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae058
Li ZQ, Xu HL, Cao HJ, Liu ZL, Fei YT, Liu JP. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2448609. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Helena Donato, Filipe Palavra (Autor)
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.