Non-Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation in Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias

Authors

  • Sara Costa Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-8531
  • Joel Freitas Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Márcio Cardoso Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • José Barros Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; ICBAS- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-5050
  • Teresa Coelho Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Joana Damásio Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; Unidade de Investigação Genética e Epidemiológica em Doenças Neurológicas (UnIGENe), Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-6398

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/AR/123/2025

Keywords:

Cerebellar Ataxia/therapy, Cerebellum, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Abstract

Hereditary cerebellar ataxias (HCA) are a heterogeneous group of neurological disorders with several underlying genetic mechanisms. The available treatments are still scarce, however the growing interest in cerebellar neurostimulation has revealed promising results. We aimed to review the published studies on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in HCA. A literature search was performed on PubMed using the keywords: [“cerebellar stimulation” OR “transcranial direct current stimulation” OR “transcranial magnetic stimulation”] AND [“spinocerebellar ataxia” OR “hereditary ataxia” OR “Friedreich ataxia” OR “Machado Joseph disease”]. The selection was made by reading the title and abstract, followed by full article analyses. A database was created with relevant information of each article, including elements related to the study design, stimulation protocol, clinical and genetic data, clinical scales used, and neurophysiological parameters. In the initial search, 72 articles were identified, from which 25 were excluded. Despite the inclusion of ACH in various studies, some studies exhibited high genetic heterogeneity and the inclusion of acquired ataxias. Most treatment protocols consisted of stimulation sessions conducted over consecutive days, with repeat sessions scheduled after a specific period. In both techniques no significant adverse effects were recorded, and in most cases the motor benefit was evident, particularly in terms of trunk and gait ataxia. There was a longer duration of stimulation effect in tDCS when compared to TMS. The results are encouraging, regarding both the safety of stimulation and improvement in motor symptoms, in particular axial ataxia. Carrying out more studies, in genetically homogeneous population, will contribute defining the role of neuromodulation techniques in the treatment of ACH.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Manto M, Gandini J, Feil K, Strupp M. Cerebellar ataxias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33:150-60. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000774.

Manor B, Greenstein PE, Davila-Perez P, Wakefield S, Zhou J, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2019;10:73. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00073.

Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett. 2019;688:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005.

Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P. Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9115-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009.

Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, Vasudevan EVL, Celnik P, Bastian A. Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:2950-7.

Ilg W, Branscheidt M, Butala A, Celnik P, de Paola L, Horak FB, et al. Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice. Cerebellum. 2018;17:628-53. doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0937-2.

Hoxha E, Balbo I, Miniaci MC, Templa F. Purkinje Cell Signaling Deficits in Animal Models of Ataxia. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2018;10:6. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00006.

Spampinato DA, Celnik PA, Rothwell JC. Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks? J Neurosci. 2020;40:4230-9.

Ferrucci R, Priori A. Noninvasive stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:393-405. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00026-3.

Herzog R, Berger TM, Pauly MG, Xue H, Rueckert E, Münchau A, et al. Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation – An intraindividual comparison of different techniques. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:987472. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.987472.

Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Boehringer A, Celnik P, Edwards MJ, Ferrucci R, et al. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation-a consensus paper. Cerebellum. 2014;13:121-38. doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0514-7.

Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Bastian A, Cortes M, Davis NJ, Edwards DJ, et al. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease. Neuroscientist. 2016;22:83-97. doi: 10.1177/1073858414559409.

Ponce GV, Klaus J, Schutter DJIG. A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation. Cerebellum. 2022;21:715-30. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01310-2.

Zhang X, Hancock R, Santaniello S. Transcranial direct current stimulation of cerebellum alters spiking precision in cerebellar cortex: A modeling study of cellular responses. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:e1009609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009609.

Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:175-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002.

Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633-9.

Kawakami S, Inukai Y, Ikazashi H, Watanabe H, Miyaguchi S, Otsuru N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;100:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.003.

Stagg CJ, Best JG, Stephenson MC, O’Shea J, Wylezinska M, Kineses ZT, et al. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5202-6.

Burke MJ, Fried PJ, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Neurophysiological and clinical applications. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;163:73-92. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804281-6.00005-7.

Iglesias AH. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Treatment in Multiple Neurologic Conditions. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20:1. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-1021-0.

Badawy RA, Loetscher T, Macdonell RAL, Brodtmann A. Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology. Funct Neurol. 2012;27:131-45.

Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994;117:847–58.

Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, Feffer K, Noda Y, Giacobbe P, et al. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1683–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2.

Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201–6.

Maeda E, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:800–5.

Naeije G, Rovai A, Destrebecq V, Trotta N, De Tiege X. Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation reduces motor and cognitive symptoms in Friedreich’s ataxia: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2023;38:1443–50. doi: 10.1002/mds.29453.

Philip NS, Barredo J, Aiken E, Larson V, Jones RN, Tracie Shea M, et al. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176:939–48. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18101106.

Grimaldi G, Taib NO Ben, Manto M, Bodranghien F. Marked reduction of cerebellar deficits in upper limbs following transcranial cerebello-cerebral DC stimulation: Tremor reduction and re-programming of the timing of antagonist commands. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00009.

Benussi A, Koch G, Cotelli M, Padovani A, Borroni B. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1701–5.

Benussi A, Dell’Era V, Cotelli MS, Turla M, Casali C, Padovani A, et al. Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:242–50.

Benussi A, Dell’Era V, Cantoni V, Bonetta E, Grasso R, Manenti R, et al. Cerebello-spinal tDCS in ataxia A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018;91:E1090–101.

Benussi A, Cantoni V, Mansa M, Libri J, Dell’Era V, Datta A, et al. Motor and cognitive outcomes of cerebello-spinal stimulation in neurodegenerative ataxia. Brain. 2021;144:2310–21. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab157.

Maas RP, Teerenstra S, Toni I, Klockgether T, Schutter DJ, van de Warrenburg BP. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022;19:1259–72. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w.

França C, de Andrade DC, Silva V, Galhardoni R, Barbosa ER, Teixeira MJ, et al. Effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on ataxias: A randomized trial. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020;80:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.09.001.

Hu Z, Tao X, Huang Z, Xie K, Zhu S, Weng X, et al. Efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in a family with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: A case report. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16190. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16190.

Ihara Y, Takata H, Tanabe Y, Nobukuni K, Hayabara T. Influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on disease severity and oxidative stress markers in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with spinocerebellar degeneration. Neurol Res. 2005;27:310–3.

Dang G, Su X, Zhou Z, Che S, Zeng S, Chen S, et al. Beneficial effects of cerebellar rTMS stimulation on a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:767–9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.225.

Kawamura K, Etoh S, Shimodozono M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for diplopia in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: A case report. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2018;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40673-018-0094-x.

Chen XY, Lian YH, Liu XH, Sikandar A, Li MC, Xu HL, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebellar metabolism in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:827993. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.827993.

Sanna A, Follesa P, Tacconi P, Serra M, Pisu MG, Cocco V, et al. Therapeutic Use of Cerebellar Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (ITBS) in a Sardinian Family Affected by Spinocerebellar Ataxia 38 (SCA 38). Cerebellum. 2022;21:623–31. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01313-z.

Sikandar A, Liu XH, Xu HL, Li Y, Lin YQ, Chen XY, et al. Short-term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in SCAS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2023;106:105236. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.105236.

Shi Y, Zou G, Chen Z, Wan L, Peng L, Peng H, et al. Efficacy of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. J Neurol. 2023;270:5372–9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11848-2.

Vavak M, Arrigoni F, Nordio A, De Luca A, Pizzighello S, Petacchi E, et al. Functional and Structural Brain Damage in Friedreich’s Ataxia. Front Neurol. 2018;9:747. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00747.

Grimaldi G, Manto M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) decreases the amplitudes of long-latency stretch reflexes in cerebellar ataxia. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:2437–47.

John L, Kiper M, Holst T, Timmann D, Hermsdörfer J. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on grip force control in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2017;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40673-017-0072-8.

Shimizu H, Tsuda T, Shiga Y, Miyazawa K, Onodera Y, Matsuzaki M, et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Hereditary Spinocerebellar Degeneration. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1999;189:203–11.

Shiga Y. Transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates truncal ataxia in spinocerebellar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:124–6.

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

1.
Costa S, Freitas J, Cardoso M, Barros J, Coelho T, Damásio J. Non-Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation in Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias. Sinapse [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 22 [cited 2025 Oct. 1];25(3):118-33. Available from: https://sinapse.pt/index.php/journal/article/view/123

Issue

Section

Review Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)